Niti Aayog’s GM Food Import Reversal Sparks Agricultural Debate

In a significant policy shift, India’s government think tank Niti Aayog has withdrawn its proposal to import genetically modified soybean and corn from the United States, reinforcing the country’s stringent biosafety regulations. The decision comes amid pressure from domestic farmers and environmental groups, who argued that GM imports could jeopardize India’s agricultural sovereignty and biodiversity. This reversal is seen as a victory for local producers, who feared competition from cheaper, genetically modified crops would erode their market share and livelihoods.

The economic ramifications of this decision are multifaceted. By prioritizing domestic production, India aims to protect its $50 billion agricultural export market, which includes non-GM soybeans and corn. The move has also spurred investments in organic farming and sustainable agriculture, with several states announcing subsidies for farmers transitioning to eco-friendly practices. However, the decision has strained trade negotiations with the U.S., which had pushed for relaxed import norms as part of a broader trade deal. Analysts suggest that India’s firm stance could lead to retaliatory tariffs, potentially impacting other export sectors like textiles and pharmaceuticals.

Public sentiment is divided, with urban consumers advocating for GM imports to lower food prices, while rural communities celebrate the protection of traditional farming. The government now faces the challenge of balancing food security with economic diplomacy. As India navigates these tensions, the Niti Aayog’s decision underscores its commitment to self-reliance, even as it prompts a broader debate about the future of agriculture in a rapidly globalizing world.